Compare/Contrast Writers Essay Example

Think about/Contrast Writers Paper There are different things that make up a bit of writing. For instance: decision of lingual authority, methods of talk, and metaphorical language. Mary Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano were extraordinary instances of creators that utilized these components of writing. There are similitudes and contrasts in A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson and From Africa to America. Despite the fact that Mary Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano shared likenesses in encounters, they had distinctive composing characters, purposes, mentalities, tones, and relations with their networks. There are four fundamental methods of talk: informative, story, expressive, and enticing. In Mary Rowlandson’s A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson, it is obvious in the title that it is an account. Like Mrs. Rowlandson’s writing, Olaudah Equiano’s From Africa to America is a story. An account type of writing is a story, record of occasions, or encounters, regardless of whether it is valid or imaginary. For this situation their accounts were their genuine encounters and they gave the peruser undeniable realities and data, likewise making it informative. The closeness of the spot and the warmth of the atmosphere, added to the number in the boat, which was packed to the point that each had barely space to turn himself, nearly choked out us. † (73) This is an ideal model demonstrating that Olaudah Equiano’s account is additionally clear, giving the peruser striking pictures in his brain, though Rowlandson’s story s eldom has spellbinding substance. These works of writing may likewise be depicted as influential by the statement of, â€Å".. Overpowered with the considerations of my condition.. † (7) Mary Rowlandson was overpowered with her feelings. We will compose a custom exposition test on Compare/Contrast Writers explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom exposition test on Compare/Contrast Writers explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom exposition test on Compare/Contrast Writers explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer This statement may convince the peruser to consider how despairing, or that it is so hard to be on a slave transport, and furthermore being held hostage by Indians. The two accounts are comparable in the encounters the two creators had. Both Mary Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano were held hostage at once in their lives. White men caught Olaudah Equiano, while Mary Rowlandson had Indian captivators. Olaudah’s story recounts the time where he previously observed the slave transport he was put on and the excursion across incredible waters to the new world. Rowlandson’s story recounts the lack of care of the Indians and her stay with the clan. It is clear that the excursion over the ocean was unpleasant enough for the ship’s travelers to end it all by hopping off of the boat instead of remaining ready for the foul smell of human squanders and absence of ventilation. In a short passage, Equiano composed of his day by day schedule before his bondage. He referenced the relationship he had with his mom, and how he was her preferred youngster. â€Å"I became, obviously, the best most loved with my mom and was consistently with her. (72) Olaudah and Mary were indistinguishable on the grounds that Olaudah had an incredible connection with his mom while Mary was partial to her own kid in her story. â€Å"About two hours in the night, my sweet angel like a sheep left this life†¦ I should and could rests close to my dead darling, one next to the other all the following evening. † (2) Neither Olaudah Equiano nor Mary Row landson finished their accounts with the relatives they were generally partial to. Equiano’s bondage was the motivation behind why he was taken from his mom while Rowlandson’s child kicked the bucket during her imprisonment. In attempting times, for example, these, Rowlandson implored God for help. Being a loyal Puritan, Rowlandson regularly read her book of scriptures during troublesome occasions. She would discover and peruse Psalms that identified with her own life’s issues and clashes. In spite of the fact that Mary Rowlandson went to God in her critical crossroads, Olaudah Equiano didn't once specify any kind of a divine being. Rowlandson accepted that with her confidence in God and to feel frustrated about past behaviors, she would be pardoned and guaranteed that condemnations will be turned onto her foes. â€Å"I came to part 30, the seven first refrains, where I discovered, there was benevolence guaranteed once more, in the event that we would come back to Him by apology.. (3) Rowlandson cited Psalm 27 ver. ult. , â€Å"Wait on the Lord, Be of acceptable mental fortitude, and he will fortify thine Heart, hold up I state, on the Lord. † (3) This statement demonstrated that Rowlandson had an undying confidence in the Lord. A relationship was held with the L ord for Rowlandson, and not Equiano. In spite of the fact that Equiano didn't have a relationship with God, he and Rowlandson both had various sorts of associations with their networks and companions. Mary Rowlandson had an aloof relationship with the New England Wampanoag Indians. The clan had no compassion toward the demise of Mary’s six-year-old little girl. The Indians took the youthful little girl from the mother and covered her on a slope. Despite the fact that they covered the youngster for Rowlandson, they didn't allow the mother to care for the dead kid nor let her keep the cadaver with her. They had no compassion since they disclosed to her she needed to leave her kid. Rowlandson had a reasonable relationship with the other lady and youngsters that were likewise abducted. Different hostages imparted a confidence in God to Mary. Mary read a Psalm to the next lady hostage, who was pregnant and wanted to get away and flee. Mary read a Psalm that clarified that God would assist you with hanging on through difficult situations. (3) While Mary had relations with the individuals around her, Olaudah had his. Equiano had basically individual Africans as his friends. These Africans were in a similar circumstance since they all were taken onto the slave transport from their homes to go to America as captives to the white men. Olaudah didn't talk at all to someone else in his account, which demonstrated that his relationship with his locale was poor. The connections these two writers had with their networks indicated perusers a smidgen of their characters. It is clear that Mary Rowlandson is more outgoing person than Olaudah Equiano. Rowlandson spoke with the individuals she was encircled by. Olaudah Equiano demonstrated that he was more loner than Mary Rowlandson in light of the fact that he didn't endeavor to have any kind of discussion with another being. He just talked about what he saw going on in the lives of the individuals around him in his story, and there was no discourse. Mary Rowlandson’s character was more clear than Olaudah Equiano’s in light of the fact that she demonstrated that she was a mindful lady. She would not like to abandon her youngster, despite the fact that it was at that point dead. Mary was likewise mindful and cherishing on the grounds that she set aside the effort to experience book of scriptures sacred writings and Psalms with another lady to give her the expectation and direction she required from their Lord. Following the Lord was one of Mary’s fundamental purposes throughout everyday life. Mary Rowlandson utilized the talk gadget advance to expert in her writing. She discussed God as though He were some way or another applicable to each part of her life, while Equiano mostly utilized intrigue to feeling in his work. Olaudah discussed the subjugation and anxieties on the slave transport and in the new world. â€Å".. Much fear and trembling among us and only severe cries to be heard all the night.. † (74) There was additionally allegorical language utilized in Mrs. Rowlandson’s extract. â€Å"My sweet angel like a sheep. † (2) Mary may have contrasted her kid with a sheep so as to depict her as a sweet, timid, unadulterated and honest young lady. Whenever thought strictly, this analogy may have been said to show that we are all God’s kids, since God was a Shepard and we are spoken to as His sheep. Both talked about themselves in their accounts in the principal individual and in plain style, alluding to themselves as, â€Å"I. Mary Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano had fairly comparative yet various mentalities and tones. Both held hostage, Mary Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano felt everything except jaunty during their seasons of imprisonment. Olaudah didn't feel like he expected to eat food on his excursion on board the slave transport. â€Å"I turned out to be so debilit ated and low that I couldn't eat. † (72) Olaudah felt desolate during this timeframe. â€Å".. With the nefariousness of the odor and crying.. † (72) Olaudah felt apprehensive and fearful during the boat ride. This pathetic circumstance was again exasperated by the annoying of the chains, yells of the ladies, and moans of the perishing, all of which rendered the entire a scene of awfulness practically unfathomable. † (73) Mary Rowlandson felt miserable portion of the time, while the other portion of the time she felt confident towards God. â€Å"This pitiful world.. † (2) and Psalm 27 (3) are cites from her selection that communicated the feelings she had. The feelings these creators had are components that help to give the motivations behind these stories. A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson and From Africa to America both have purposes to engage and advise perusers with their background and stories. Mrs. Rowlandson’s gives confidence and expectation that trying occasions will be overwhelmed by the adoration and leniency of God. Mr. Equiano’s story illuminates perusers regarding the despondency that Africans experienced as a result of the childishness white men had to possess slaves. Olaudah’s story might be viewed as an update that individuals in the most recent age have things simple contrasted with the time he was alive. Individuals ought not underestimate what they have, for instance opportunity. The individuals of today have the most opportunity than any time in recent memory. Albeit two distinct creators composed these works of writing,

My worldview as a Christian Essay

This article is with the end goal of officially expressing my perspective as a Christian and exhibiting how I see reality when it relates to specific issues. While this won't have changed much from my unique perspective framework, it serves to develop the issues and give clever investigation to my convictions. As this semester attracts to a nearby, and I reexamine my perspective diagram, I a consistency between my convictions and those introduced in the course material. Subsequent to breaking down the significant inquiries, I have had the option to discover scholastic help for every conviction that I hold. The primary inquiry we were posed was ‘Who is God, and what is he like?’ my underlying answer was that God is the maker of paradise and earth, the incomparable heavenly being that manages and impacts ordinary occasions. With respect to His attributes, I accept that he is totally just while being brimming with effortlessness. He is total force, under flawless control. H e has extraordinary feelings, however ideal responses to them. That is who God is to me. The subsequent inquiry was about people, what they were, and what happened when they passed on. A human is a being made in the picture of God, with capacities for reason, and an intrinsic comprehension of good and bad. At the point when a human bites the dust, they go to one of two spots. The individuals who have decided to follow God will go to paradise. The individuals who don’t will push off. The third inquiry was ‘what is the idea of the universe?’ When I hear that, I need to ask what they mean commonly. I need to glance around and state ‘is it the genuine physical world, and how it fits into a greater picture? I would accept along these lines, and state that essentially, what God made was acceptable, And was later dirtied by transgression. The most confounding inquiry was ‘how do I comprehend what I know, and how would I know it’s true?’ I recognize what I know in light of what I’ve been told, and wha t I’ve experienced, and how I apply it through the channel of my confidence and qualities. What's more, I realize that I know in such a case that I didn’t realize that I knew I wouldn’t have the option to dissect this inquiry concerning knowing. The following inquiry was the one in particular that my answer changed marginally. What is good and bad, or does it exist? Right exists, yet wrong is just the nonattendance of right, not something all by itself. Also, the main way we can find it is through the encounters, of ourselves as well as other people, and through the channel of God’s word. Is life futile or is there a reason? In the event that we trust God makes us, we should accept that there is an explanation. I accept my motivation is to help individuals through tough situations, since I have experienced enough difficult situations that I can feel for them. Every individual has an interesting quality that causes them laud God here and there. What center duties are reliable with my perspective, and how would they sway my life? I’m still not actually secure with what is implied by center duties, however the activities and qualities that I hold myself to distinguish key parts of my perspective. I would state tha t the things I do are reliable with my good and otherworldly convictions. My perspective is put together a ton with respect to confidence, and I attempt to discover purpose behind what I accept. I do need to assess if the convictions that I have really have base in actuality, experimentally and ethically. I have solid convictions and conclusions, because of originating from an exceptionally obstinate family. My perspective is predictable with the viewpoints communicated in the coursework. I have a genuinely profound foundation in scriptural examinations from different schools, thus have been presented to this subject more than the normal understudy. Thus, my perspective has been formed by what I have realized, and there were barely any logical inconsistencies between what I accept and what was introduced. My perspective goes (as far as anyone is concerned) the entirety of the four trial of a perspective. In the trial of proof, my perspective draws from individual experience and logical explanation, and accept (if not demonstrates) the presence of a God who epitomizes the attributes I have distinguished. In the trial of sensible consistency there is no motivation to question what I have seen or perused, and I do whatever it takes not to act outside of my convictions in a manner that would make any irregularity be obvious. In the trial of existential offensiveness, it is conceivable to carry on with the existence that I am endeavoring to live in the ‘outside’ world. Anybody can carry on with an ethical life and adhere to explicit guidelines about how we ought to administer ourselves, however not all alone. What's more, the trial of human instinct is steady with my conviction on the idea of humankind. Nothing about humankind recommends that we are not planned by a higher being, and everything focuses to inborn worth that different animals don't and can not have. My perspective influences everything about my activities, since I won't leave that casing of reference without changing piece of my perspective. I can't act outside of my perspective, since I will consistently break down things dependent on what I expect to be correct data, and will act as needs be. My perspective has remained reliable all through this course, and on the off chance that it has changed at the sum total of what it has been an inner mind change. I have had a decent childhood and a strong foundation in scriptural examinations, so I didn't hear whatever was amazingly new or progressive. Cosgrove, M. P. (2006). Establishments of Christian idea: confidence, learning, and the Christian perspective. Excellent Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications. Strobel, L. (2000). The case for confidence: a columnist researches the hardest issues with Christianity. Stupendous Rapids, Mich.: ZondervanPublishingHouse. Wilkens, S., and Sanford, M. L. (2009). Covered up perspectives: eight social stories that shape our lives. Killjoys Grove, Ill.: IVP Academi

How to Dodge 5 Illegal Interview Questions

How to Dodge 5 Illegal Interview Questions Every one of us had the opportunity to find himself/herself in this position- an interview for our dream job. We prepare ourselves the best we can, we do our best to leave the finest impression there is.Sometimes we even simulate it at home, so that we know how to answer the possible questions. And somehow things work pretty well until, out of nowhere, we hear “Are you married?”Before you know it, you’ve found yourself in a very unpleasant situation. Thats because this one, as well as many other questions, are illegal. This means even though the interviewer asks some of these, you are not obliged to answer it.All the questions related to your family or marital status, language, citizenship, and nationality, gender, age, race, religion, height and weight, criminal record etc. are forbidden.Simply put- all those that would reveal personal information which could potentially lead to discrimination.We have chosen some of these questions, perhaps the most significant ones, to help y ou find the right answer without revealing anything that would make you feel uncomfortable.Every interviewer has the reason for asking some of these illegal questions (unlike those that are legal, but difficult to answer to).Once you know what’s behind that, you will be able to give the right answer within the limits of legal. Each of these questions can be asked in a bit alternative way so that both sides can be satisfied.The whole point is to keep the job interview within the limits of job-related information, gracefully avoiding these tricky questions.5 ILLEGAL INTERVIEW QUESTIONS AND HOW TO DODGE THEMAs we said, the top five illegal questions are the ones related to gender, marital and family status, citizenship, nationality and language, age and religion.That’s why we picked them to show you the best way to dodge them.There’s always a background, and the sooner you discover it, the sooner you will manage to keep the conversation in the right way.And by background, we mean the reason why the interviewer asks these questions. The best way to show it is by giving the examples of the right and wrong way to ask them.1. What’s your Gender?Even though one could say that there are some jobs that are better suited for women, whereas some others are more appropriate for men, it really doesn’t matter. Gender definitely has no influence over the quality of your work.Another reason why the interviewer should never ask this question is because of transgender people. Sometimes is simply not so obvious whether a person is male or female, so asking a question in this form can hurt his/her feelings.The reason why the interviewer is asking about gender could be that he/she is interested in how you can contribute to the team you are supposed to be in. If you are a woman and you are supposed to be working with a group of men, will you be comfortable with that? Same rule applies in opposite situations. So, instead of asking such direct and rude questions, like the on e we listed here as well, we shall give you good and bad examples.Bad example: So far, only man/woman worked in this position. Do you think you could handle it well?Good example: What can you bring to this role?Bad example: Are you capable of managing men/women well?Good example: Could you tell me more about your previous staff managing experience.As you can see, it doesn’t take much to get the desired information by asking the right and polite question. You as a potential employee should give your best to stay focused and find the appropriate words.So, even if the interviewer asks directly, try to answer in a way that you don’t mention gender at all. Instead, point out your previous experience and role, and what were your contributions to it.2. Marital or Family StatusThese questions mostly bother women, as they are usually the ones taking absences from work due to children’s bad health and similar. Being a successful mother and successful employee at the same time can be dif ficult these days. One has to be a superhero in order to balance between these two.Starting from a job interview, if a woman feels that her family will be a “problem” for the future job, you can only imagine all the frustration. And that’s not all! You know that some couples don’t want to have children, whereas some cannot, due to some health problems.There are also gay and lesbian couples, with or without kids.So, direct questions related to this can also lead to many hurt feelings. After all, if one is capable of meeting the deadlines and working quality, the questions about family and marital status really have nothing to do with the job.Here are some of the bad and good examples of how an employee can find out whether a potential applicant is suitable for the job or not. Some of them are exclusively for women, and some can also be related to men.Bad example: Do you have children? Do you plan to have them? How many children do you have? Do you have childcare arrangements in case of working overtime?Good example: Would it be a problem to work overtime or during weekends occasionally? How do you feel about traveling for work?Bad example: Are you pregnant? Would you come back to work after maternity leave?Good example: Tell me something about your long-term career goals.Bad example: Are you married? Is this your maiden name?Good example: Are there any references or qualifications of yours under another name?By asking any of the family or marital status related questions, an interviewer simply wants to know, how reliable a potential candidate would be in terms of presence and absence at work.As we said, it’s particularly hard for women in a situation when these questions are asked. But, like with the previous group, just keep the conversation on a safe pace and no reasons to worry. Try to point out your professional qualities, the responsibility, and punctuality, since these are the qualities required for any job.3. Citizenship, Nationality, or Langua ge related questionsIt has been a thing that’s been going on for quite a long time. People migrate from one place to another, and naturally, they look for a job in a place where the accommodated themselves. For this reason, an interviewer should never be curious about personal data regarding language, citizenship, and nationality. These kinds of questions can only be asked in one situation- for monitoring purposes! Even in that case, it is done anonymously.So, even when the interviewer notices that the applicant has a bit uncommon or unusual name, that he/she speaks with a different accent, he/she should refrain from asking direct personal questions. As long as a candidate has the right qualifications for the job, nothing else matters. The purpose of these question is to find out whether the applicant is eligible to work in that country, are there any legal issues that can be an obstacle.Here are the most common illegal questions related to nationality, citizenship, and language, as well as their legal counterparts.Bad example: Where were you born? Where are you from?Good example: Are you eligible to work in (the name of the country)?Bad example: What is your native language?Good example: What languages are you fluent in?The greatest catch of all is that these types of questions often slip as conversation starters. So, even when the interviewer didn’t intend to ask you some of these, it happens by accident.If you are positive that it happened by accident, you can smile, give an answer and return with the same question, or you can avoid the answer by leading the conversation back to safe.4. What’s your Age?Somehow you will always notice a bit illogical thing- some employers want to have younger employees with lots of experience. Doesn’t it make a bit absurd? Some people gain experience through their work, and the more they work the better professionals they become.However, there are some job positions which require more physical strength which means tha t a younger person would be more suitable.On the other hand, some states have laws that prohibit age discrimination and protect the potential workers, but it applies to people over 40. So, if an interviewer points out that a certain role is more suitable for more experienced and older people, though it sounds utterly unfair, still it’s not illegal.We shall now list good and bad examples of age-related questions, along with bits of advice on how to turn the answer into your favor.Bad example: How old are you?Good example: Are you over the age of 18?Bad example: When did you graduate?Good example: Do you have degrees, certificates or some other qualifications related to this position/role?Bad example: When do you plan to retire? How long do you plan to work before retirement?Good example: Tell me more about your long-term career goals and plans.Even though these questions are rather tricky, there’s actually a very good way how to give the best answers without revealing how old are you. It’s not the point to hide your ages, but to point out that some other things matter more to the job than the information of your age.For example, if you are a younger applicant, and this happens to be your first job interview, point out all the activities you had so far which can contribute to the work. Let’s say, volunteering, or some seminars. That way you show that even though you may not still have some rich experience, you are willing to expand the knowledge and improve yourself.If you are an older candidate, put the accent on the rich experience you have gained. Show that all your knowledge and working habits can contribute significantly. Point out that you are willing to learn more.You see that finding the right words is not so difficult, as long as you have in mind the right intention of the interviewer. After all, they are trying to find the best possible candidate, so they want to make sure that they are making the right choice. Make things easier for the interv iewer by showing why you are the best person for that position.5. Do you believe in God?And finally, we have reached the question of religion. Having in mind that God is a word that appears a lot I conversation even when it has nothing to do with religion (like OMG), still one should be careful.The questions of religion and beliefs are sensitive ones. People tend to argue a lot on that. And sincerely, whether someone believes in God or not, whether one is an atheist or whatever else, really have nothing to do with a job. For that reason, the interviewer shouldn’t even consider asking this question at all.Here’s how to ask this thing impolitely and politely.Bad example: What religion do you practice? Which religious holidays do you observe?Good example: Would it be a problem to work in the schedule/days required for this role/position?The only reason why the interviewer may be interested in asking the religion-related question is for the sake of being informed whether the employe r will be able to work during a certain period of time.Moreover, he probably wants to know how to plan weekend and holiday schedules. Perhaps the best would be that you as an applicant politely point out that you won’t be able to work during certain days without mentioning religion. Ask as well would it be a problem.There’s always a solution which won’t compromise either of the sides.ADDITIONAL ILLEGAL QUESTIONSBesides these top five questions, there are few more which should never be mentioned in a job interview. Like these five, they have nothing to do with job qualifications and are of no importance for any job position. These are questions related to:Credit and financial situationAddictionsDisabilities and health issuesCriminal recordAffiliationsLocationHeight or weightThe financial situation is of no importance and has no influence over the job. Asking this will only put the applicant into an uncomfortable position.As for the addiction, well, naturally, if an employee sho ws up drunk as a skunk at work, it will be a problem. But as long as the employee respects no-smoking and no-alcohol rules at work, these questions are redundant.Speaking of medical issues, one should not confuse medical history with a medical certificate. This certificate is often issued for some positions and roles, but that is to state that there’s no communicable disease and that you are fit to work. Any other information regarding your health is not necessary.The question for criminal records only goes in certain situations. For example, if someone is to apply for a position “driver”, an interviewer may ask if there were any fines and arrests related to driving.Affiliation works pretty much the same as religion. Whether you belong to a certain political party or a social club is an entirely personal thing, and has no significance for your future job.The interviewer has no reason to ask this question because each person has a different view of how far is one ready to trave l to work (location). One would commute for two hours just to work in a position that fulfills him/her, whereas the other would think that 20 minutes is an eternity. As long as the applicant states that he/she can get to work on time, location doesn’t matter.Height and weight are also of no importance when it comes to job qualifications. Even though certain jobs require more agility and strength, the ones where the employee should lift heavy things, for example, an interviewer shouldn’t ask about these two. Instead, he can ask whether the candidate is comfortable with lifting heavy things or climbing high places and such.As you can see, these questions are also unnecessary during a job interview. Each one of them, as well as the five above-mentioned has their better and more polite alternatives.If we speak from a position of an interviewer, the goal is to get as much useful information as possible without hurting the rights and feelings of the applicant. If we speak from the pos ition of an applicant the goal is to show that one is the right candidate by revealing only job-related data. In both cases, it happens that a conversation slips in the wrong direction.That means not only the interviewer but a candidate as well may give answers and information that the interviewer initially wanted to avoid.STEERING THE CONVERSATION IN THE RIGHT DIRECTIONSwitch to a more suitable topicEven if you are in the middle of an uncomfortable question, and you want to vanish, still try getting out of that situation by suggesting another topic. It doesn’t have to happen out of blue, but try to link to some word or phrase that seems suitable and natural for what you want to say next.Stay within job-related topicsAs we already said, some questions simply slip off, with no bad intentions. One may or may not answer them. However, if the conversation is strictly job-related, no problems will occur. So, even if it happened that you wander off-limits, try returning the conversation in the “business-only” direction.Focus on the futureBy this, we mean future that’s job-related. Always point out the importance of the experience you will gain if you get the job. Also, show that you are willing to learn. Moreover, show how you can contribute long-term by working on that position. Even if you haven’t got the clearest idea about some far future points, these universal phrases can help you break the initial ice.Ask your own questionsAgain, ask job-related ones. It’s neither rude nor illegal to inquire about your future team, organizations, some plans. Of course, try phrasing the question so that it sounds polite. Imagine for a sec that you are an interviewer and pay attention to the tone of the sentence as well as the words you are using.FINAL WORDAs you see, the job interview doesn’t necessarily have to be a stressful experience. It’s easier said than done. However, knowing all these illegal questions in advance helps a lot. It gives you a slight advan tage over the interviewer. When you know all of them, as well as their better alternatives, the chances to blow up are minimal.Another thing you should do in advance is to inform well about the company you are applying for. Visit their website for some basic information so that you are familiar with the company business. That’s the least you can do, and it will leave the impression that you have a professional approach towards the job.You can even practice the interview with someone who’s close to you. The best is to choose someone who will be objective enough to tell you honestly all the good and bad sides.In the end, it’s all a matter of luck and occasion, but yours is to give the best you can do. Every job interview is an important and useful experience. Even if we don’t get the job, we still get the picture how does the interview look like, what to expect next time and so on. Knowledge makes us richer, and that means a lot.